Society without nature does not exist, this is a non-separable pair of the reality, therefore it does not have nature that it is not social. The society when it is assumen of the nature constructs another geography thus, humanizando and transforming it into geography human being who has its base in physical geography. Since the period that if it initiated the quarrel enters chains of the determinista thought and possibilista, it was eliminated interpretation on the nature. Beginning the Ratzeliano thought if occupies with a problem that if it originated in the philosophy that is the quarrel on the relation man-half and among others to explain the man of century XIX, being Ratzel criticized for the Frenchmen judged that it as politician and not as scientist. Questions had been appearing as what they are the differences between the peoples? Which is the essence of a people? If it has relation between man and way and because this relationship happens? For Ratzel the necessities human beings are centered in the feeding and the habitation and force the relationship of the man with the way. It it initiates the understanding of the relation society-nature, however not of the continuity, therefore it is concentrated in criticizing its predecessors; to affirm that the geographic conditions influence the societies and the grouping of individuals if it carries through around the survival thus originating the people, its territory, the State where in agreement the relation society-nature if configures different States; to argue epistemologia and the methodology. For Marx and Engels a relation exists enters the men by means of appropriation of the nature where the social division of the work emerges. History and geography if inaugurate when initiating themselves it relation society-nature, therefore when the society if appropriates of the nature it creates a new order space-weather. The distinction between the men and the animals is characterized by the condition of the human beings to produce its life material e, therefore to construct itself to it same, different of the animals that act its instincts and momentneas necessities in accordance with.

Fat and Muscles

Subcutaneous fat in many women sometimes have a density that it can hardly be distinguished by the texture of the muscles. From this tale about growing by leaps and bounds musculature. Another common misconception, chilling real and potential owners of good muscle, that muscle can eventually turn into fat. Absurd and a lie! Fat and muscle in origin, and the structure (Histologically) belong to different tissues and each other, under any circumstances can not proceed. Sometimes you can hear the "sincere," the story of former athletes and athletes, especially women, the month prozanimavshis figure skating or gymnastics in deep childhood.

Explaining the reason for excess weight, blaming everyone and everything to justify their laziness, resigned to despair, they are sadly showing their swollen form, complaining that all acquired by overwork the muscles, so cunningly converted by the body into fat. Do not rush to fall apart in sympathy to the victims of these ruthless sport and do not be afraid to get a couple extra pounds of muscle, instead of fat. Enlarged (hypertrophied) muscles very quickly return to their former size after the cessation of regular training. The danger lies in the change of life – maintaining the usual high-calorie food, combined with reduced physical activity, which leads to the accumulation of body fat, which replaces and exceeds the size of the lost muscle. So what to do to lose weight? The only real way to get rid of fat – this is our use of body fat depots as a source of energy for working muscles in a certain mode.